基于监测站点的侵蚀性降雨标准研究以漫川漫岗海伦黑土坡耕地为例

Erosive rainfall standard based on monitoring stations —A case study of sloping black soil farmland in the rolling hills region of Hailun

  • 摘要: 侵蚀性降雨标准的拟定是土壤侵蚀预报的关键,不仅能有效减少预报工作量,还能提高预报精度。本研究基于国家水土保持监测黑龙江省海伦市光荣小流域水力侵蚀观测重点站2013 — 2024年的实测降雨产流产沙数据,采用降雨侵蚀力偏差法,对比分析了裸地、传统耕作、免耕秸秆覆盖和荒地4种土地利用方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准,以及标准达到稳定所需的年限,并通过相关指标进行评价。结果表明,裸地小区的侵蚀性雨量(P)标准为12.1 ~ 13.3 mm,侵蚀性最大30 min雨强(I30)标准为9.9 ~ 12.0 mm·h−1;传统耕作小区的P标准为14.4 ~ 18.0 mm,I30标准为12.7 ~ 16.5 mm·h−1。免耕秸秆覆盖和荒地小区的侵蚀性降雨标准均高于裸地和传统耕作小区,免耕秸秆覆盖小区的PI30平均标准值较裸地小区分别提高1.1和1.3倍,较传统耕作小区分别提高65.2%和68.7%;荒地小区的PI30标准值较裸地小区分别提高1.2和1.3倍,较传统耕作小区分别提高70.0%和72.8%。通过对比相对误差、错选率、剔除率和损失率4个评价指标,发现裸地和传统耕作小区宜采用I30标准,免耕秸秆覆盖和荒地小区则宜采用P标准。随着降雨数据资料年限的增加,PI30标准的相对误差和变异系数减小,当年限达到11 a时,研究区所有土地利用方式的PI30标准的合格率均达到100%,即达到稳定。该研究可为东北漫川漫岗黑土区土壤侵蚀预报和水土流失防治规划提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The determination of erosive rainfall standard is crucial for soil erosion prediction, which can effectively reduce the workload of prediction and improve the accuracy of prediction as well. Based on the measured rainfall, runoff, and sediment yield data from 2013 to 2024 at the Guangrong Small Watershed Key Water Erosion Observation Station of the National Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring in Hailun City, Heilongjiang Province, the erosive rainfall standard under four land use (bare land, conventional tillage, no-tillage with straw mulching, and wasteland), as well as the number of years required to stabilize the standard was compared with the rainfall erosivity deviation method, and relevant indicators were used to evaluate the accuracy of erosive rainfall standard. The results show that, for bare land plot, the erosive rainfall (P) standard is 12.6 - 13.3 mm, and the erosive maximum 30-minute rainfall intensity (I30) standard is 9.9 - 12.0 mm·h−1; for the conventional tillage plot, the P standard is 14.4 - 18.0 mm, and the I30 standard is 12.7 - 16.5 mm·h−1. The erosive rainfall standards of no-tillage with straw mulching and wasteland plots are both higher than those of the bare land and traditional tillage plots. The P and I30 standards of no-tillage with straw mulching plots are averagely increased by 1.1 and 1.3 times compared with the bare land plot, and by 65.2% and 68.7% compared with the conventional tillage plot, respectively. The P and I30 standards of the wasteland plots are averagely increased by 1.2 and 1.3 times compared with the bare land plot, and by 70.0% and 72.8% compared with the conventional tillage plot, respectively. By comparing four evaluation indicators, namely relative error, wrong selection index, efficiency index, and erosion loss, the I30 standard is suitable for bare land and conventional tillage plots, while the P standard is suitable for no-tillage with straw mulching and wasteland plots. With the increase in rainfall data duration, the relative error and coefficient of variation of the P and I30 standards decrease. When the rainfall data reaches 11 years, the qualification rates of the P and I30 standards for all land use reach 100%, meaning they become stable. This study provides a reference for soil erosion prediction and soil and water loss prevention and control planning in black soil with rolling hills in Northeast China.

     

/

返回文章
返回