不同物料改良苏打盐碱土的效果评估

Efficacy evaluation of different amendments in improving saline-sodic soil

  • 摘要: 松嫩平原西部的苏打盐碱地是重要的后备耕地资源,采用合适的物料改良这类土壤以适应作物种植,全面提升土地产能是当前亟待解决的问题。本研究开展了为期2年不同改良物料施用后种植水稻的田间试验,改良物料处理包括草炭土(PE)、磷石膏(PG)、脱硫石膏(DG)、腐熟羊粪(MU)和液体改良剂(LQ),以不施用改良物料作为对照(CK)。为了克服苏打盐碱土空间异质性大的问题,采用混合效应模型分析了改良前后土壤理化特征的变化。研究结果表明,改良物料PE、PG、DG和LQ施用两年后,土壤pH较改良前分别降低了0.13、0.20、0.24和0.82个单位,土壤电导率(EC)较改良前分别降低了34.2%、58.3%、15.3%和53.9%;MU和CK处理较改良前pH分别增加了0.47和0.26个单位,EC分别增加了76.4%和107%;改良物料PE和MU处理的土壤有机质(SOM)第一年较开垦前增加了17.2%和14.0%,第二年较开垦前下降了10.3%和29.2%,而CK处理第一年和第二年SOM较开垦种植前降低了28.6%和41.4%,改良物料PG、DG和LQ处理的SOM变化不显著;上述5种不同改良物料处理的土壤质量指数均显著增高(P<0.05),增高幅度为7.25% ~ 40.5%,其中LQ效果最显著,其次是MU。与未施改良物料CK相比,不同改良物料处理显著增加稻谷产量(P<0.05),PE、PG、DG、MU和LQ的增产效果分别为2.83倍、3.95倍、3.77倍、3.83倍和1.37倍。综合来看,改良物料PG和MU处理的水稻产量和投入产出效益相对更优,但从土壤单项指标上看,二者施用短期有增加土壤盐分EC风险,必须配合科学的灌排洗盐措施。因此,苏打盐碱土改良物料的选择必须综合作物产量、土壤质量和经济成本等多种因素,科学配置混合改良物料是未来盐碱土改良的重要发展方向。

     

    Abstract: Saline-sodic soils are widely distributed in western Songnen Plain, as an important reserve agricultural resource, improving the soils through appropriate materials to make it suitable for crop growth and enhancing land productivity is required. To address this issue, we conducted a two-year field experiment using various soil amendments, including peat (PE), phosphogypsum (PG), desulfurized gypsum (DG), sheep manure (MU), and liquid amendment (LQ), with no amendment added as the control (CK). To overcome the spatial heterogeneity of saline-sodic soil, a Mixed Effect Model was used to analyze the changes in soil physicochemical properties before and after the application of amendments. The results show that after two years of applying amendments, PE, PG, DG, and LQ decrease soil pH by 0.13, 0.20, 0.24, and 0.82 units, while the soil electrical conductivity (EC) decreases by 34.2%, 58.3%, 15.3%, and 53.9% respectively, compared to pre-reclamation. In contrast, the MU and CK increase pH by 0.47 and 0.26 units, and EC by 76.4% and 107%, respectively. The PE and MU treatments increase soil organic matter (SOM) by 17.2% and 14.0% in the first year, but decrease SOM by 10.3% and 29.2% in the second year compared to pre-reclamation. While CK treatment decreases SOM by 28.6% and 41.4% in the first and second years, respectively, compared to pre-reclamation, no significant changes are found in PG, DG, and LQ treatments. All five amendment treatments significantly increase the soil quality index (P<0.05) with an increase ranging from 7.25% to 40.5%, and the most significant effect is found in LQ treatment, followed by MU treatment. Compared to CK, different treatments significantly increase rice yield (P<0.05) by 2.83 fold in PE, 3.95 fold in PG, 3.77 fold in DG, 3.83 fold in MU and 1.37 fold in LQ. Overall, the PG and MU treatments exhibit relatively better rice yield and input-output efficiency. However, in terms of individual soil indicators, both treatments pose a short-term risk of increasing soil salinity (EC) and must be accompanied by scientific irrigation and drainage measures to leach salts. Therefore, the selection of amendments must consider crop yield, soil quality, and economic costs. The appropriate configuration of mixed amendments, tailored to local conditions, is an important direction for the future development of saline-sodic soil improvement.

     

/

返回文章
返回